Safe Passage Project has joined over 560 organizations to call on DHS and ICE to ensure that immigrant survivors of violence can access safety and protections.
The letter may be read in its entirety HERE.
Safe Passage Project has joined over 560 organizations to call on DHS and ICE to ensure that immigrant survivors of violence can access safety and protections.
The letter may be read in its entirety HERE.
by Sarah Gonzalez, reporter for WNYC
Lenni Benson, Founder of Safe Passage Project
Sarah Gonzalez discusses the potential consequences of President Donald Trump looking to limit ‘unaccompanied’ status for immigrant children. Tune in here to listen to Sarah Gonzalez interviewing Lenni Benson, founder of Safe Passage Project, and to read the full article.
Please see below for an English translation of the article.
AMANDA MARS, Nueva York 22 FEB 2017 – 22:04 CET
Habrá juicios, detenciones, manifestaciones. También conflictos entre el Gobierno federal y esas llamadas “ciudades santuario” -Nueva York, Los Ángeles o Chicago- que hacen la vista gorda con los inmigrantes sin papeles. Pero el corazón de las nuevas directrices de la Administración de Trump sobre las deportaciones será difícil de batallar en los tribunales, al menos, por el momento: la política de prioridad en la expulsión es una potestad presidencial y, además, los documentos publicados este miércoles no especifican los procedimientos de la puesta en marcha.
“Muchas partes del memorando que hemos conocido hoy hablan de que se tiene que crear un comité para ver cómo implementan las medidas, con lo cual es muy difícil llevarlo ante un juez, porque aún no se ha puesto en marcha. Lo que pasó con el decreto del 27 de enero [el que vetaba temporalmente la entrada a los llegados de siete países de mayoría musulmana] es que el Gobierno lo puso en marcha inmediatamente y se pudo parar. Ahora hay que ver cómo todo eso entra en vigor”, explica Rex Chen, miembro de Safe Passage Project, una asociación de abogados sin ánimo de lucro de Nueva York que ayuda a los miles de menores de edad que entran cada año solos y de forma irregular.
Las directrices conocidas este viernes mantienen la protección a los llamados dreamers, jóvenes que llegaron como niños a Estados Unidos y que han crecido en el país sin papeles. Pero Chen advierte de que “esto solo significa que aún no hay una decisión tomada al respecto, Trump dijo que era un asunto muy complejo y necesitaba tiempo, pero no se sabe aún qué hará”.
Faye Hipsman, del Instituto de Política Migratoria, una organización independiente para estudio de los movimientos migratorios, recalca que detener, en bloque, las nuevas directrices “es muy difícil, aunque probablemente veremos muchos litigios, porque el presidente es el que tiene la autoridad a la hora de fijar las prioridades en las deportaciones”. Hipsman coincide con Chen en que la situación de los dreamers, los que un día fueron niños migrantes, no está clara todavía.
El principal cambio de la guía de actuación de Trump es que es esfuerzo en la detención y expulsión de los inmigrantes sin papeles -se calcula que hay unos 11 millones en Estados Unidos- ya no son aquellos con delitos a la espalda, sino que “todo el mundo en situación irregular puede ser expulsado”.
Para aquellos en situación irregular que lleven menos de dos años en el país, además, se ha abierto la puerta a las expulsiones inmediatas, sin pasar por el tribunal. El problema de un extranjero sin papeles que sea detenido será poder demostrar que lleva más tiempo en Estados Unidos y para eso es necesario tener localizados rápidamente documentos que lo justifiquen. “No creo que tengan que llevar las pruebas encima todo el tiempo, pero sí es importante que sus familiares o amigos sepan muy bien dónde están y puedan entregarlos enseguida”, apunta Chen.
Llevar a cabo las deportaciones será costoso, de momento, el departamento de Seguridad Interior ha anunciado que contratará 15.000 nuevos agentes. William A. Stock, de la Asociación Americana de Abogados de Inmigración, advierte de que “el incremento masivo en detenciones requerirá miles de millones en fondos que el Congreso tendrá que imponer a los contribuyentes”, y la falta de recursos para contratar a los jueces de inmigración y los agentes de asilo “significa que el sistema se volverá más lento y disfuncional”.
Algunas organizaciones sostienen que el giro en la política de deportaciones ya se empezó a ver en las últimas semanas. Hace dos, de hecho, una operación de cinco días por parte de la agencia encargada de aplicar las leyes migratorias se saldó con centenares de detenidos en al menos seis Estados de todo el país.
AMANDA MARS, New York FEB 22 2017 – 22:04 CET
There will be trials, detentions, demonstrations. Also conflicts between the federal government and those so-called “sanctuary cities” – New York, Los Angeles or Chicago – that turn a blind eye to undocumented immigrants. But the heart of the Trump administration’s new guidelines on deportations will be difficult to battle in court, at least for the time being: the priority policy on expulsion is a presidential power, and in addition, the documents released this Wednesday do not specify start-up procedures.
“Many parts of the memorandum that we have known today speak of a committee having to be set up to see how they implement the measures, making it very difficult to bring before a judge because it has not yet been set in motion. Decree of January 27 [the one that temporarily vetoed the arrival of the newcomers of seven countries of Muslim majority] is that the Government started it immediately and it was able to stop. Now it is necessary to see how all this enters into force,” explains Rex Chen, a member of the Safe Passage Project, a New York nonprofit law association that helps the thousands of children entering every year on their own and in an irregular manner.
The guidelines known this Friday maintain the protection of so-called dreamers, young people who arrived as children to the United States and who have grown up in the country without papers. But Chen warns that “this just means that there is still no decision made, Trump said it was a very complex matter and needed time, but it is not yet known what he will do.”
Faye Hipsman of the Institute of Migration Policy, an independent organization for the study of migratory movements, stresses that blocking the new guidelines “is very difficult, although we will probably see a lot of litigation, because the president is the one that has the authority to set the priorities in the deportations.” Hipsman agrees with Chen that the situation of dreamers, who once were migrant children, is not clear yet.
The main change in Trump’s action guide is that it is an effort to arrest and expel undocumented migrants – an estimated 11 million in the United States – are no longer those with crimes on their backs, rather “everyone in an irregular situation can be expelled.”
For those in irregular situations that have been in the country less than two years, in addition, the door has been opened to immediate expulsions, without going through the court. The problem of an undocumented foreigner being detained will be to prove that he has been in the United States for the longest time, and for that it is necessary to quickly locate documents that justify it. “I do not think they have to take the evidence on them all the time, but it’s important that family members or friends know where they are and can deliver them right away,” Chen notes.
Carrying out the deportations will be costly, so far the Department of Homeland Security has announced that it will hire 15,000 new agents. William A. Stock of the American Immigration Lawyers Association warns that “the massive increase in detentions will require billions in funds that Congress will have to impose on taxpayers,” and the lack of resources to hire immigration judges and asylum agents “means that the system will become slower and more dysfunctional.”
Some organizations argue that the shift in deportation policy has already begun to emerge in recent weeks. Two days ago, in fact, a five-day operation by the immigration enforcement agency resulted in hundreds of detainees in at least six states across the country.
Safe Passage staff and affiliates have been incredibly busy providing educational and legal clarity to immigrant communities as new announcements continue to spark fear and uncertainty throughout the city.
Among those hard at work is Professor Lenni Benson, founder, who attended a February meeting of the Brooklyn community group Darfur People’s Association. Afterwards, Benson stayed to assist Sudanese attendees in better understanding their own unique immigration situations.
Her time speaking with attendees is quoted in the article Sudanese Refugees After the Ban from the 3/6/17 edition of The New Yorker and may be read in its entirety HERE.
Benson is also quoted a recent article in City Limits, where she discusses the relationship between New York City’s record of protecting immigrant data and the Trump administration’s insistence that it will sanction municipalities who refuse to cooperate with immigration officials.
“The importance of the details matter,” Benson says. “Until the federal government articulates rules and programs and specifics, I don’t think people should stay away from safe housing because they are afraid the city would have to turn over their records.”
The 2/24/17 article, Shelter System and Other NYC Services Should Be Safe For Migrants, Experts Say may be read on the City Limits website HERE.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
SAFE PASSAGE PROJECT STATEMENT ABOUT THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY’S MEMORANDA IMPLEMENTING INTERIOR ENFORCEMENT AND BORDER SECURITY EXECUTIVE ORDERS
New York, NY – February 21, 2017 – Safe Passage Project is concerned that two policy memoranda dated February 20, 2017 and signed by John Kelly, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), will put unaccompanied children from Central America and other countries at risk of serious harm and will prevent children from obtaining immigration relief they qualify for.
The memoranda would, for certain children, eliminate protections under the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008, and would subject children to the horrors of expedited removal. The memorandum entitled “Implementing the President’s Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements Policies” (the “border security memo”) suggests that the government may seek to remove the designation “unaccompanied alien child” from children who have parents or legal guardians in the United States, even if they are in fact unaccompanied at the time they cross the border and face DHS officials.
Imagine an 8-year-old who crosses our borders seeking protection. Unless she is able to convince a Department of Homeland Security officer that she has a fear of returning to her home country or intends to apply for asylum, she will be removed from the U.S. on an expedited basis. She will not have the opportunity to talk to a lawyer or see a judge; she will simply be sent back. This is an unjust process that should never be employed against a vulnerable child, and yet the memoranda propose doing just that.
The border security memo also provides that DHS may direct enforcement resources toward the parents of children who made the dangerous journey to the United States to flee violence and persecution in their countries of origin. Specifically, the memo seeks to initiate removal or even criminal proceedings against parents that have directly or indirectly assisted their children to enter the U.S.
While these provisions purport to “protect alien children from exploitation and prevent abuses of our immigration laws,” we are concerned that these policy changes will have the detrimental effect of discouraging parents from claiming their children who arrive at our borders seeking protection from violence and other abuses. It may discourage the reunification of a child with a parent or legal guardian in the United States who is available to provide adequate care. By keeping parents away from children, these policies may deprive children of caretakers who would be best positioned to care for and assist them in the preparation of their legal claims. It may also result in an increased number of unaccompanied children who are forced to remain in detention indefinitely.
Implementation of the two new policy memoranda needlessly puts vulnerable unaccompanied children and their families at risk. Parts of the memoranda purport to be aimed at the elimination of child trafficking, but in fact, the result will be increased fear and child exploitation.
We are very proud and inspired by our colleagues Alex Rizio, Claire Thomas and Founder Lenni Benson for the roles they have played in response to the recent executive orders on immigration and refugees.
The following post appeared originally on New York Law School’s website. Click HERE to read it there. Since this posting, a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) has been issued against key components of the executive order and is currently making its way through the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.
Claire R. Thomas speaking with officers at JFK January 28th.
It was late Friday, January 27 when their phones lit up with emails and calls. As New York Law School’s nationally recognized immigration law Professor Lenni Benson and Adjunct Professor Claire R. Thomas ’11, who lead the School’s immigration law courses, sifted through urgent notifications, they learned that dozens—possibly hundreds—of international travelers were in detention and facing deportation at JFK International Airport and other airports throughout the country. News of President Donald Trump’s Executive Order halting immigration from seven countries—Libya, Sudan, Syria, Yemen, Iran, Iraq, and Somalia—was rapidly spreading through New York City’s network of immigration lawyers.
Across campus, Professor Deborah N. Archer, who co-directs the School’s Impact Center for Public Interest Law, teaches its Civil Rights Clinic, and leads its Racial Justice Project, began hearing from students who were eager to help. There was barely any time to plan as the names of affected families began to trickle into Professor Archer’s Facebook and email inboxes.
NYLS has long been active in legal advocacy and representation involving the nation’s most pressing immigration law issues, which often affect New York City. This time was no different, except for the glare of international media.
By Saturday, the situation intensified. Travelers from the seven countries whose flights had been in transit when the Executive Order was signed continued to arrive at JFK Airport. Thomas threw her phone charger and a hard copy of the Immigration and Nationality Act into her bag and hopped onto the A train, bound for the airport. The Air Train was eerily devoid of travelers with luggage; instead, Thomas found herself surrounded by sign-carrying protesters. She kept Professor Benson on speed-dial.
Soon after she entered JFK Airport’s Terminal One, Thomas began fielding questions from Yemeni and Iranian families anxiously awaiting news about relatives detained after landing. She connected with representatives from the New York City Mayor’s Office for Immigrant Affairs and shared immigration law knowledge with volunteer attorneys drafting habeas petitions on behalf of those detained. Soon after, Professor Vicki Eastus and Justin Meeks 4L Evening, who are also part of the Impact Center, arrived and set to work answering family members’ questions and connecting them with attorneys. Professor Benson fielded calls all day and throughout the following night, sleeping with her cell phone under her pillow.
Meanwhile, from points throughout the city, Professor Archer and her students were relaying the names and contact information of affected families to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which is representing many of the detainees. The group was also working closely with detainees’ relatives, including a man whose wife was refused entry to the U.S. and sent back to Qatar, where she had been visiting family. Throughout, Professor Archer and her students kept in close touch with Thomas and others at JFK Airport, performing research and rapidly proofing habeas petitions remotely.
That night, when a federal judge from the Eastern District of New York issued an order halting some portions of the Executive Order, the NYLS team scanned the first copy they could get—a photograph of the decision posted to Twitter.
Six habeas petitions and countless legal questions later, Thomas left the airport. It was around 2 a.m. on Sunday. Shortly after, she learned that one of the detainees she’d worked with, a green card holder from Iran, had finally been released. After a brief respite, the NYLS team was back at work drafting petitions and making referrals. The pace of work is unlikely to slow: news reports reveal that more than 100,000 visas have been revoked since the Executive Order was issued. ~
Safe Passage Project has joined dozens of other New York organizations in a letter to Senators Gillibrand and Schumer to oppose the nomination of Senator Jeff Sessions as Attorney General of the United States. Sessions’ confirmation vote has been pushed back to Tuesday, January 31st. The full text of the letter may be read below.
Dear Senator Schumer and Senator Gillibrand:
The undersigned New York-based organizations urge you to vigorously resist the appointment of Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL) as Attorney General of the United States. We hope you will consider using any and all methods available to you to prevent Senator Sessions from being confirmed by the U.S. Senate.
Much of New York’s vitality and prosperity is owed to the more than four million immigrants who call our State home. Together they account for a fifth of the State’s population and a quarter of its economic output. As organizations that serve New York immigrant and refugee communities, we are very disturbed by the prospect of Sen. Sessions leading the Department of Justice.
The Attorney General is the single most powerful figure responsible for this country’s immigration laws. In addition to being in charge of the nation’s immigration courts, the Attorney General is empowered to create new regulations, require particular forms of bonds or other documentation, issue new instructions, review past administrative determinations in immigration proceedings (including Board of Immigration Appeals’ decisions), amid a whole host of other duties. Sen. Sessions’ record on immigration and his affiliations with anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim organizations prove he is too extreme to be this country’s top lawyer and law enforcement officer.
SENATOR SESSIONS’ DANGEROUS ANTI-IMMIGRANT RECORD
Sessions has proven himself to be the most dangerous ally of the anti-immigrant movement in Congress since his election in 1996. He has received awards from the anti-immigrant hate group FAIR and has invited members of anti-immigrant organizations to testify at numerous Congressional hearings.
During his twenty-year tenure in the U.S. Senate, Sessions has consistently opposed any efforts to reform the country’s immigration laws, referring to the bipartisan 2007 bill as “terrorist assistance.” He has long been a champion for draconian immigration enforcement laws (self-deportation) that break families apart. He has railed against the DREAM Act (and DACA) and has been a fierce proponent of stripping citizenship from children born in this country to undocumented parents. Sessions has also advocated for greatly reducing legal immigration limits citing “cultural” concerns: “The numbers cannot be too great or it takes jobs from Americans and can, in fact, create cultural problems that wouldn’t occur if it was a little slower.”
SENATOR SESSIONS’ CONNECTIONS TO ANTI-MUSLIM ORGANIZATIONS
Sessions has a disturbing relationship with anti-Muslim extremists and organizations. He has received numerous awards from the anti-Muslim David Horowitz Freedom Center and the Center for Security Policy, both of which promote vicious conspiracy theories and animosity towards American Muslims. Sessions has not shied away from blaming an entire religion for the actions of few, “We need to use common sense with the who-what-where of the threat. It is the toxic ideology of Islam.”
The United States Attorney General has immense power over the lives of immigrants and refugees–Sen. Jeff Sessions’ has demonstrated through his voting record, associations with extremist organizations and his public statements that he is not the person for the job.
In addition to his views and actions impacting immigrants and Muslims, Sen. Sessions has a deeply disturbing track record on women’s rights, racial justice, voting rights, gun reform, criminal justice, LGBTQ rights, environmental justice and the rights of people with disabilities.
By any measure, Sen. Sessions is grossly unqualified to be the nation’s top law enforcement office. We urge you to publicly and loudly oppose his nomination to be Attorney General.
Safe Passage Project has joined over 850 other immigrants rights organizations nationwide in a letter sent to President Trump prior to his inauguration.
The letter details the impact and importance of the DACA program and urges the President to preserve the program for the benefit of the economy, the public, and national security. It also mentions DACA’s importance in light of the BRIDGE Act proposed by Senators Lindsay Graham (R-SC) and Dick Durbin (D-IL).
This is one of many ways Safe Passage Project is working to ensure the rights of immigrants under the new administration.
The original letter may be read at the Immigrant Legal Resource Center’s website HERE.
On December 18, 2016 The New York Times published an editorial, “Proud to Be a Sanctuary City” that cites a “groundbreaking City Council program”. We know this program as ICARE and we are proud to be part of this program and be responsible for some of the 1,265 cases mentioned in this piece.
In an article published on December 7, 2016, “‘Broken windows’ policing could hand city’s immigrants over to Trump, lawyers say” Crain’s examines speculation of what life for immigrants might be like under Trump. In particular, Crain’s focuses on how the city will behave as a “sanctuary-city” and how low-level arrests might mean deportation.
The article contains the joint letter to Speaker Mark-Viverito signed by Rich Leimsider, Executive Director, on behalf of Safe Passage along with leaders from Brooklyn Defender Services, The Legal Aid Society, The Bronx Defenders, Central American Legal Assistance, The Door and Catholic Charities Community Services, who together write to say “The NYPD’s high-arrest policies thus effectively provide the federal government with ready-made lists of thousands of immigrant New Yorkers whose humanity, family and community ties, and even lawful residency, can be undermined simply because they bear the label of ‘criminal’ for the most paltry alleged offenses.”